Mertz v. 999 QUEBEC, INC.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentMaring, Justice
[¶ 27] I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion and would reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings. I am of the opinion that the discovery rule applies to a survival cause of action and that there exists a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment.
[¶ 28] The purpose of the discovery rule is “to balance the need for prompt assertion of claims against the policy favoring adjudication of claims on the merits and ensuring that a party with a valid claim will be given an opportunity to present it.” Wells v. First American Bank West, 1999 ND 170, ¶ 9,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Fine v. CheccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Reading Co. v. KoonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.