Legal Opinion

Mezoff v. Mezoff

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 12, 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

There was no error in the entry of a decree by a probate judge that the petitioner was living apart from the respondent for justifiable cause (cruel and abusive treatment) and an order that the respondent pay $300 as an allowance to the petitioner for counsel fees. Where, as here, there is a report of material facts but the evidence is not reported, the question is whether the decree was warranted on the facts found by the judge with any inferences we may draw therefrom. Topor v. Topor, 287 Mass. 473, 476 (1934). Reed v. Reed, 340 Mass. 321, 322 (1960). The judge found inter alia that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Topor v. ToporMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Bailey v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  3. Curtiss v. CurtissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Reed v. ReedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  5. Ober v. OberMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hano v. HanoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  2. Roberts v. RobertsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  3. Dunn v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API