Pittman Const. Co. v. Boles
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Chief Justice.
This controversy involves an award by the circuit court of Macon county under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Code 1923, § 7534 et seq.).
Section 7578 of the Code of 1923, in prescribing the procedure in case of á controversy, provides in part as follows, to wit: “The complaint shall be filed with the clerk of the court and upon service of such complaint, as hereinafter provided for, any judge of such court shall make an order fixing the time and place for the hearing thereof, which time shall be not less than thirty days after the service of summons to the employer as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Duluth Diamond Drilling Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
3Cited by9 opinions
- SCI ALABAMA FUNERAL SERVICES v. HesterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Humphrey v. PossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Braswell v. Brooks ex rel. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Ex Parte Pittman Const. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1938
- Ex Parte Cowabunga, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.