Legal Opinion

City of Waycross v. Cullens

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 26, 1940No. 13413PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

1. By the express terms of section 11 of the Waycross street-improvement act of 1925 (Ga. L. 1925, pp. 1557, 1566), providing as to assessments and collections for improvements and issuance of bonds under a plan analogous to what is known as the “baby bond or Oklahoma plan of paving” (see Code, § 69-421), when an execution is issued and turned over to the city marshal or his deputy, it is made his duty, after levy, “advertisement and other proceedings as in case of sales for city taxes of said city,” to sell the same, “at public outcry as in other city tax sales, to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knox v. YowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Green v. FreemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Mallard v. CurranSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Burckhalter. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. George v. ClarySupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Speed Oil Company v. AldredgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Head v. WaldrupSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API