Legal Opinion

People v. Holmes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 2001No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from two judgments in connection with the robberies of two jewelry stores. The indictment was severed and separate trials were conducted with respect to each robbery. Contrary to defendant’s contention, the evidence is legally sufficient to support the convictions and neither verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495).

With respect to the trial on the first indictment, County Court properly denied the motion of defendant to suppress his statements. The court’s assessment of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. StokesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. People v. LuciousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. People v. SimmsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. People v. FrenchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API