Legal Opinion

Martin v. Metropolitan Jockey Club

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 1945PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered on the verdict of a jury, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries caused by falling on stairs in defendant’s clubhouse. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The method of construction created a question of fact for the jury. (McGahan v. St. Saviors B. G. Church, 290 N. Y. 825; Kern v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Go., 241 N. Y. 600.) Assuming that Mrs. Hilbert, a witness for plaintiff, fell in the grandstand and not in the clubhouse, the jury could infer from her testimony that she fell under similar…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brady v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Kern v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. McGahan v. St. Saviors R. C. ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heimer v. StentoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API