Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Speer v. Dighton Grain, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 28, 1981No. 51,852Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHerd, J.

I concur with the majority’s reversal of the trial court’s judgment but for a different reason. I would reverse because the trial court erred in submitting the case on the theory of comparative negligence which is inapplicable to a gross negligence action.

I also disagree with the majority holding that a creditor of a corporation cannot maintain an action against a corporate officer and director for negligence in the discharge of his corporate duties resulting in injury to the creditor. I recognize there is a sharp division of authority on this issue. The authorities supporting denial of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Greenfield Savings Bank v. AbercrombieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. McFeeters v. RenolletSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  3. Patrons State Bank & Trust Co. v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Campbell v. WatsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1901
  5. Beard v. Achenbach Memorial Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API