Legal Opinion

Culver v. Newhart

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 1912No. Civ. No. 916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County, and from an order denying a new trial. James P. Lodge, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The complaint alleges that on the first day of September, 1910, the defendant was indebted to Mrs. A. E. Culver, wife of the plaintiff, in the sum of $687.90, “the same being a balance of an open, current and mutual account,” etc., which said account is annexed to and made a part of the complaint; that on said first day of September, 1910, Mrs. Culver “sold, assigned and set over the said decount to this plaintiff. ’ ’

The answer denies that the defendant was at any time indebted to Mrs. Culver in any sum or amount, and also denies the alleged assignment of the account referred to in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Norton v. LarcoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parker v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Rains v. ArnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Pedley v. DoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API