State v. Hall
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
DeviN, J".
The judgment below, from which the State appealed, denied the power of the court to enforce the provisions of the statute with respect to a quantity of intoxicating liquor which had been seized by State officers while being unlawfully possessed and unlawfully transported in the State by the defendant Bert Hall. The ruling appealed from was based on the ground that the liquor was being transported in interstate commerce and was therefore protected from seizure for unauthorized acts of the persons in possession, however unlawful.
In the consideration of the question thus presented we…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Ziffrin, Inc. v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Duckworth v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. GudgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1973
- Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Parkhill Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- State v. O'HoraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Matthews v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917