Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kentucky Department of Corrections v. McCullough

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 2004No. 2000-SC-0727-DG, 2001-SC-0146-DGPublished

1Concurrence

Concurring by

Justice KELLER.

I concur in the majority opinion because I agree with its analysis of the issues presented in this case. I write separately, however, to reiterate that, in my view, McCullough should not have been permitted to recover any damages from the Kentucky Department of Corrections (“KDOC”). I joined Justice Cooper’s dissenting opinion in Department of Corrections v. Furr1 (“Furr") because I believed then — as I believe now — that the Commonwealth’s agencies cannot be sued for money damages under the Kentucky Civil Rights Act (“KCRA”) because the General Assembly has not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Department of Corrections v. FurrKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Jones v. CrittendenKentucky Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API