Kentucky Department of Corrections v. McCullough
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Concurrence
Concurring by
Justice KELLER.
I concur in the majority opinion because I agree with its analysis of the issues presented in this case. I write separately, however, to reiterate that, in my view, McCullough should not have been permitted to recover any damages from the Kentucky Department of Corrections (“KDOC”). I joined Justice Cooper’s dissenting opinion in Department of Corrections v. Furr1 (“Furr") because I believed then — as I believe now — that the Commonwealth’s agencies cannot be sued for money damages under the Kentucky Civil Rights Act (“KCRA”) because the General Assembly has not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Department of Corrections v. FurrKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Jones v. CrittendenKentucky Supreme Court · 2002