Legal Opinion

DeRose v. Lombardi

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1964No. Appeals, 241 and 302PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

Joseph DeRose is the payee on two judgment notes totalling $25,000. The notes are dated February 16, 1950, payable one year after date, and each is signed as follows:

“Joseph Lombardi & Sons by Joseph Lombardi”

Both notes contain a warrant of attorney to confess judgment, and, upon leave of court, judgment was confessed against Joseph Lombardi, Dominic J. Lombardi, Robert Lombardi, Joseph P. Lombardi, Jr., and Joseph Lombardi & Sons. The confession of judgment was supported by affidavits alleging that at the time of execution of the notes, Joseph Lombardi & Sons…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jamestown Banking Co. v. Conneaut Lake Dock & Dredge Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Miller v. Royal Flint Glass WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Russeck v. ShapiroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Mullen v. SlupeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Fairman Bros. v. Ogden Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Copley Qu-Wayne AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Manor Building Corp. v. Manor Complex Associates, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. In Re Estate of McCauleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Prestressed Structures, Inc. v. Bargain City, U.S.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Lincoln Avenue Industrial Park v. NorleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API