Legal Opinion

Cory v. Loomis

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1983No. Civ. No. 24787Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, J.

Contending the probate court erred in interpreting a will provision, the State Controller appeals an order sustaining objections to an inheritance tax report and fixing inheritance tax in the estate of Elsa Loomis Mc-Manus directing all bequests be delivered free from all estate and inheritance taxes which shall be paid from the residue of the estate. The court correctly found the provision did not apply to the payment of state inheritance taxes because of the insufficiency of the residue after the payment of debts, claims, and expenses of administration. We reject the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Estate of RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Bolstad v. Wells Fargo Bank American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. In Re Estate of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Estate of ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Crocker v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API