Legal Opinion

In Re the Code of Judicial Conduct

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 29, 2002No. C4-85-697PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

In Republican Party of Minnesota v. Kelly, 247 F.3d 854 (8th Cir.2001), cert. granted, 122 S.Ct. 643 (U.S. Dec. 3, 2001) (No. 01-521), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that the provision in the Minnesota Code of Judicial Conduct that prohibits a candidate for judicial office from announcing “his or her views on disputed legal or political issues,” Canon 5(A)(3)(d)(i) (the announce clause), as construed by the district court in Republican Party of Minnesota v. Kelly, 63 F.Supp.2d 967 (D.Minn.1999), is narrowly tailored to further compelling state interests.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Republican Party of Minnesota v. KellyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  2. Republican Party of Minnesota v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Republican Party of Minnesota v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Republican Party of Minnesota v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Raatz v. Unitog Rental ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. Republican Party of Minnesota v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API