Legal Opinion

State v. German

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 2019No. A18-0883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHooten, Judge

Appellant was convicted of first-degree controlled-substance crime for possessing methamphetamine, committing a gross misdemeanor or felony while possessing a bulletproof vest, and driving without a valid license. He argues on direct appeal that there was insufficient circumstantial evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he knowingly possessed methamphetamine, and he argues that he was denied a fair trial because of prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments. We affirm.

FACTS

In December 2014, Farmington Police Officer Christopher Lutz was on patrol when he noticed a Ford F-150…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. AndersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. State v. SilvernailSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Derek Alexander Knapp v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
  2. State of Minnesota v. James Michael PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  3. State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Jermaine ChamberlainCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  4. State of Minnesota v. Shawn Eric ClementCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API