Legal Opinion

Kimmel v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1999No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiffs in accordance with the following Memorandum: These are appeals by plaintiffs and cross appeals by defendants from two discovery orders. In appeal No. 1, plaintiffs appeal from an order insofar as it ordered that plaintiffs must pay defendants 15 cents per page plus an amount for an employee’s time to copy all documents produced by defendants; that defendants need not produce police personnel files of nonparties; that audiotapes of depositions of two defendants shall be inadmissible; and that defendants…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Holloway v. Cha Cha Laundry, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Kahn v. RodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Carella v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Ennist v. ShepherdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Bonavita v. CrudoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kimmel v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Kern v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Grossman v. Team Care Home Care Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Francisco v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Bansi v. Flushing Hospital Medical CenterNew York Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API