Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jones v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 2003Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

JUDGE FRIEDMAN.

I respectfully dissent. Jerry Jones (Jones) is a parolee who spent thirteen months in custody without posting bail awaiting disposition of new criminal charges and received a sentence of only twelve months. The majority holds that Jones is not entitled to credit on his original sentence for the extra one month of prison time that cannot be applied to his new sentence. I realize that, pursuant to Berry v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 756 A.2d 185 (Pa.Cmwlth.2000), a parolee whose confinement awaiting disposition of new criminal charges exceeds…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Thomas Harry Durkin v. Jack F. Davis, Director, Dept. Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  3. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  4. Rodriques v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Mitchell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API