Legal Opinion

Compuadd Corp. v. Texas Instruments Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 8, 1998No. 97-50368PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:

The Defendants appeal the district court’s remand of a preferential avoidance action. That court determined that the two-year statute of limitations in 11 U.S.C. § 546(a)(1) governing trustees does not apply to such action brought by a debtor-in-possession. For reasons that follow, we reverse the district court’s decision and affirm the Bankruptcy Court’s dismissals on statutory limitations grounds.

I

CompuAdd Corporation (“CompuAdd”) filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition June 22, 1993. Because no trustee was appointed, it became the debtor-in-possession (“DIP”) at that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Heirs of BoisdoréSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  5. Zilkha Energy Company v. Arthur Leighton, Verna Leighton, George W. Leighton, Susan Kay Stansberry, Ann E. Thompson, and Michael Frank ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re: Compuadd CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API