Legal Opinion

Harvard Farms, Inc. v. National Casualty Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 2, 1990No. 89-209PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JORGENSON, Judge.

Harvard Farms, Inc., et al., appeal from an order of final summary judgment in an action to recover under an animal insurance policy covering theft and unlawful removal of a horse. For the following reasons, we reverse.

Harvard Farms entered into an insurance contract with National Casualty Company which covered the “theft and unlawful removal” of a purebred Arabian horse named Sahr Hal Sahr. The policy contained an exclusionary clause which stated:1

BUT IN NO EVENT DOES THIS EXTENSION COVER: a) any loss arising from mysterious disappearance, escape, or voluntary parting of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. PridgenSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Coastal Plains Feeders, Inc., Cross v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Edward J. Gerrits, Inc. v. Royal Marine Service Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. PMR Construction, Inc. v. Ranger Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Saks v. National Casualty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API