Legal Opinion

In re Hume

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 30, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

At the trial, on an indictment for crime, exceptions were saved. After a jury verdict of guilty, sentence was imposed, notwithstanding the exceptions, as the statute requires. R. S., Chap. 146, Sec. 26. The respondent moved the trial court (the Kennebec Superior Court), at a term subsequent to the certification by the Law Court of its rescript overruling the exceptions and awarding judgment for the State (131 Me., 458, 164 A., 198), to vacate, set aside, and declare the conviction and sentence (which is still being served) to be without force and effect.

The motion alleged newly discovered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nelson v. MeadeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
  2. State v. HumeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
  3. State v. ColeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AlexanderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  2. State v. HumeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API