Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2007No. 78S01-0701-CR-4PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

A long-cherished principle of the American justice system is that a citizen may not be prosecuted for a crime without clearly falling within the statutory language defining the crime. This rule of law requires the granting of the defendant’s motion to dismiss in this case.

Supported by a probable cause affidavit referencing allegations that the defendant, having previously expressed a romantic interest in a seventeen-year-old female, rubbed his hand up the slit in her dress near her calf area when she was a passenger on the school bus he was driving, the State charged Rick L.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spangler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Merritt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Sunday v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Toomey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. WhitneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Panther Brands, LLC and Panther Racing, LLC v. Indy Racing League, LLC d/b/a Indycar, Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing, LLC and Document and Packaging Brokers, Inc. d/b/a DocupakIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Jones v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API