Legal Opinion
Maas v. Maas
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 7, 1989No. 88-00729PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
541 So.2d 160 (1989)
Roger R. MAAS, Appellant,
v.
Jane A. MAAS, Appellee.
No. 88-00729.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 7, 1989.
Roger R. Maas, Monticello, pro se.
John T. Allen, Jr. of John T. Allen, Jr., P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellee.
SCHEB, Judge.
In Maas v. Maas, 440 So.2d 494 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), we remanded this dissolution action to the trial court for further proceedings. The ex-husband now challenges a final judgment awarding $10,000 in attorney's fees to his ex-wife on the ground that the trial judge failed to comply with Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Boyle v. BoyleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. GrahamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Shields v. ShieldsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Winterbotham v. WinterbothamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. GrahamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Simpson v. SimpsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Burnham v. BurnhamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Saporito v. SaporitoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Harris v. McKinneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.