Legal Opinion

Sheaffer v. Eichenberg

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 1916No. Appeal, No. 263PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 263, Oct. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of O. P. Lancaster Co., June T., 1913, No. 61, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Leah M. Sheaffer v. S. U. Eichenberg. Assumpsit to recover a portion of the proceeds of real estate.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 263, Oct. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of O. P. Lancaster Co., June T., 1913, No. 61, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Leah M. Sheaffer v. S. U. Eichenberg. Assumpsit to recover a portion of the proceeds of real estate. Before Landis, P. J. The court stated the facts in the charge which was in part as follows: It is admitted that the plaintiff, Mrs. Sheaffer, was the owner of a house and lot of ground, located in the Township of Warwick, in this county. It is also admitted that, on November 9, 1907, she and her husband made a deed for the same to S. U. Eichenberg, the…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Kephart, J.,

The plaintiff was the owner of a house and lot of ground in Lancaster County. On November 9, 1907, being indebted to the defendant she and her husband made a deed of conveyance to the defendant, and at the same time entered into an agreement out of which the present controversy arises. The agreement provided that when the plaintiff had paid to the defendant the *516sum of $924.59, with all tax rates, charges and assessments against the property, and the charges for keeping an insurance against fire upon the buildings, and also paid all rents equal to the interest on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. King's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Weaver v. GriffithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Artzerounian v. DemetriadesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Smyth v. ResnickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API