Legal Opinion
Phillip Wayne Bailey v. Jack Cowley Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 25, 1990No. 89-5100PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Petitioner appeals from the district court’s order of May 16, 1989, denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner is incarcerated in Oklahoma as a result of his conviction of several drug offenses in 1984. His petition alleged that his 1984 sentences were enhanced by reason…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Granberry v. GreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- John W. Duvall v. Dan ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Richard Hardiman v. Dan M. Reynolds, Warden and Attorney General of the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Hendrickson v. AFSCME Council 18Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Walter Stewart v. Howard Peters, IIICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Wilburn Rollo Mansfield v. Ron ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.