Legal Opinion

State v. Van Orden

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1995No. 03A04-9401-PC-11PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHEZEM, Judge.

Case Summary

Plaintiff-Appellant, the State of Indiana ("the State"), appeals the grant of Defendant-Appellee's, Julie Van Orden's ("Van Or-den"), petition for post-conviction relief. We reverse.

Issues

The State presents several issues for our review which we restate as follows:

1. Whether Van Orden was medicated involuntarily for purposes of attaining competency to assist in her defense at trial;

2. Whether the jury was informed about the drug type used to medicate Van Orden and its effect on her demeanor during the trial;

3. Whether Van Orden was denied effective assistance…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Rickman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API