Lovell v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Hendricks Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This was a prosecution for incest. The indictment charges that the defendant, on the 10th of December, 1856, at Hendricks county, did, then and there, have sexual intercourse with one'Sarah E. Curtis, his stepdaughter, he, defendant, then and there well knowing, &c. Plea, not guilty. Verdict for the state, upon which the Court, having refused a new trial, rendered judgment, &e.
The record contains a bill of exceptions, which shows that upon the trial Sarah E. Curtis was produced, and testified that on the first of December, 1856, she was engaged^ in weaving, when the defendant, her…
2Cited by16 opinions
- State v. MarkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- People v. HobbsIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- McPhearson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. HilbergUtah Supreme Court · 1900
- Thomas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.