Legal Opinion

Dodson v. . Bush

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 1811PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The act of 1794, on which the proceedings in this cause are grounded, is remedial, and ought to be so expounded as to obviate the mischief and advance the remedy intended. The object of the Legislature was to speedily settle conflicting claims to property attached.

The decision here complained of is setting aside the judgment by default after the cause had been pending two or three terms. It has not, however, been shown, nor is it believed, that any evil can arise from such decision. No time is limited by the act of Assembly when the party claiming the property attached shall interplead. We…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brittain v. . PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Carthey v. . WebbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1813
  3. Parish v. . FiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1813
  4. President of the Bank of Newbern v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1813
  5. Cotton v. . BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1813

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Unaka & City National Bank v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API