Legal Opinion
Austin Mutual Insurance v. Schultz (In Re Schultz)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided August 2, 1988No. 16-26644PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
M. DEE McGARITY, Bankruptcy Judge.
This adversary proceeding was brought by the plaintiff, Austin Mutual Insurance Company, to determine dischargeability of a debt under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). The debtor, Dawn M. Schultz, has moved for summary judgment asking that the debt be declared dischargeable as not arising from the willful and malicious conduct of the debtor. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).
For the reasons set forth below, the debt- or’s motion will be granted.
FACTS
The following facts are not in dispute. On December 4, 1987, a car driven by the debtor…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tinker v. ColwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- In Re Jesse H. Long, Debtor. Barclays American/business Credit, Inc. v. Jesse H. LongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Condict v. Condict (In Re Condict)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- E. J. Den Haerynck v. Clarence Stewart ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Harrison v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brill v. Dvorak (In Re Dvorak)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Cablevision Systems Corp. v. Cohen (In Re Cohen)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- Madden v. Fate (In Re Fate)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- Basham v. Druen (In Re Druen)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1990
- Bairstow v. Sullivan (In Re Sullivan)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.