Legal Opinion

Creighton v. Hoppis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1884No. 11,266Published

From the Kosciusko Circuit Court.

1Opinion

On Petition fob a Reheabing.

Elliott, J. —

In the argument of appellant’s counsel, on the petition for a rehearing, is this quotation: “ The admissions of a party are evidence against himself, whether made in connection with an act done or not, but a party can not, as a general rule, prove his own statements as evidence for himself.” Scobey v. Armington, 5 Ind. 514; Denman v. McMahin, 37 Ind. 241. Many authorities are cited in support of this statement of the law. The work of counsel was entirely superfluous, for we stated this general rule in our former opinion quite as broadly as any case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Denman v. McMahinIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Pierson v. Doe ex dem. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Doe, on the Demise of Maxwell v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Scobey v. ArmingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API