Legal Opinion

United States v. Alex Elias, Also Known as Puff, Luis Otero, Also Known as Gardana

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 25, 2002No. Docket 01-1176PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Alex Elias appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Ross, /.), convicting him, after a jury trial, of robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (the “Hobbs Act”). Elias argues (1) that the trial evidence was insufficient to establish the jurisdictional element of the Hobbs Act conviction because the government failed to prove the requisite effect on interstate commerce and (2) that improper remarks made by the prosecutor during rebuttal summation were prejudicial. 1

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. United States v. Sewn NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. Jackson v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Linwood WilkersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. ParkesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. State v. ChitwoodOregon Supreme Court · 2022

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API