Legal Opinion

In re the Compulsory Judicial Settlement of the Account of Gilman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by Lester C. Gilman, as executor, from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Kings, entered in the office of said Surrogate’s Court on the 24th day of January, 1916, judicially settling his account.

1Per curiam

The testator gave to his executors the property “of which I may die seized or possessed, together with such other estate, *186both real and personal, as to which for any cause I may die intestate,” in trust to pay the net income as .follows: To Julia A. Percival, otherwise known as Gilman, $100 per month for her life; to Percy B. Gilman, son, $30 per month for his life (if income proved insufficient, then out of principal); to Lester 0. Gilman and Ealph F. Gilman, the balance in equal shares, until Ealph shall attain the age of thirty years. Upon Ealph becoming thirty years old, the executors…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Beuren v. . DashNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of GilmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1915
  3. Roberts v. BosworthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of AbramowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  2. Gaines v. HuylerNew York Supreme Court · 1920
  3. In re the Estate of BartletNew York Surrogate's Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API