Legal Opinion

Hay v. Conner

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 15, 1806PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Baltimore County Court. The appellants, by their next friend, brought an action of trover in that ^oiirt against the appellee, for the conversion of a mulatto male slave called James Perry. The general issue was pleaded. The facts are stated in the following opinion of file county court, delivered at the trial in February 1802, by • , 1 : II.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Baltimore County Court. The appellants, by their next friend, brought an action of trover in that ^oiirt against the appellee, for the conversion of a mulatto male slave called James Perry. The general issue was pleaded. The facts are stated in the following opinion of file county court, delivered at the trial in February 1802, by • , 1 : II. Ridc.ely, CL J. In this case the evidence offered to the jury is, that John Hay, deceased, father of the plaintiffs, in his life-time executed a bill of sale to the plaintiffs, who were and still are infants under the age of twenty-one years,…

1Opinion of the Court

The Court

said, the action of trover was well brought, and reversed the judgment.

JUDGMENT REVERSED, AND PROCEDENDO AWARDED,,

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Corrie's CaseHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1830
  2. Townshend v. DuncanHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1826

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API