Legal Opinion

Troup Bros.

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 24, 1979No. 64-79PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This Government contract case is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant argues that this court has no jurisdiction over the case because plaintiff failed to exhaust its administrative remedies. Plaintiff counters that the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 is applicable to this case, and entitles plaintiff to bypass the Engineer Board of Contract Appeals to bring a direct appeal to this court. We agree with defendant and hold that the Contract Disputes Act does not apply to this case and that plaintiff has failed to exhaust its administrative remedies.

On December…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zidell Explorations, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brookfield Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  2. Monroe M. Tapper & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  3. Dot Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. Philadelphia Regent Builders, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  5. S. J. Groves & Sons Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API