Legal Opinion

G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. Sumrow

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 14, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Hunt County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 329. Market value of growing crop; evidence admissible to prove. It was not error to admit the evidence objected to by appellant as to the damage done to appellee’s crop. It is evident from appellee’s claim that it was for damages for the partial destruction of his matured but ungathered cotton crop. In arriving at an estimate of such damage it was competent for him to prove that the cotton destroyed would have made, when gather, ginned and baled, three average bales, and that the market value of said three bales would have been $40 each, less the expenses of gathering,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beckham v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Scottish Union & National Ins. v. Moore Mill & Gin Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Oehler v. ScammelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Fike v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API