Legal Opinion

Frudden Lumber Co. v. Kinnan

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 17, 1902PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Marshall District Court. — Hon. Obed Caswell, Judge. Action in equity to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Judgment for the defendants, from which the plaintiff appeals.—

1Opinion of the Court

Sherwin, J. —

1 *952 3 4 *94One Jones was the principal contractor for the building of a house for the defendants. The plaintiff was a lumber company, which took orders for and sold mill work manufactured by others. Jones and one Stubbs, a salesman for Carr, Adams & Co., figured the mill work required for the defendant’s house according to the architect’s plans and specifications, and the same was ordered by Jones of Carr, Adams & Co. at the agreed price of $218. There is a controversy as to whether the goods were sold and furnished to Jones by Carr, Adams & Co. or by the plaintiff, but we think the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neilson, Benton & O'Donnel v. Iowa Eastern R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  2. Lee v. HoytSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Giant Portland Cement Co. v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Humboldt County v. Ward Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  3. Ohio Oil Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Moffitt Building Material Co. v. U. S. Lumber & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  5. Sheldon v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API