Allendale Mutual Insurance v. Excess Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
This case presents the Court with the unfortunate dilemma of either dismissing an action for want of jurisdiction after more than three years of litigation including a trial or reconfiguring the case to create diversity jurisdiction where none exists. Because such reconfiguration would strain the Supreme Court’s guidelines on diversity jurisdiction, the former *1118course is more prudent. In addition, any efficiencies that might be gained by continuing this litigation in federal court would be squandered if the parties are forced to begin again in state…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Allendale Mut. Ins. Co. v. Excess Ins. Co. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999