Legal Opinion
State v. Adame
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 14, 2006No. 25,238PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
{1} The main legal issue raised by this case is whether a defendant’s statements to the police, given voluntarily but without benefit of warnings pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), may be used as the grounds for a search warrant pursuant to which physical evidence that forms the basis of a conviction is seized. We hold that under federal law, they may be so used. In addition, Defendant raises two other issues that we rule are mostly inapplicable to the facts or were not raised below.
FACTS
{2} Defendant was convicted of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. PataneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CooperNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. OlivasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. SuskiewichNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. GarzaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. KetelsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. SuskiewichNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015