Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re the Marriage of Cardona

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 2010No. 09CA1996Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Judge DAILEY

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur in all but part I(C) of the majority's opinion. Initially, I acknowledge that the issue of how to treat unused sick and vacation time in a dissolution action is a very difficult one to resolve. See Lesko v. Lesko, 184 Mich.App. 395, 457 N.W.2d 695, 699 (1990) ("On the one hand, [the husband] may become ill and not retain his sick days until retirement. On the other hand, he has accumulated these sick days and vacation days during the marriage, he has a right to the use or pay for these days and they are capable of being assigned a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of BalansonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. Marriage of Abrell v. AbrellIllinois Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API