Legal Opinion

Stelmack v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 3, 2010No. 2D09-3354PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILBERMAN, Judge.

John Stelmack was found to be in possession of several images showing the faces and heads of two girls, ages eleven and twelve, cut and pasted onto images of a nineteen-year-old woman lewdly exhibiting her genitals. A jury found him guilty of five violations of section 827.071(5), Florida Statutes (2007), which proscribes the knowing possession of a photograph or representation that, in whole or in part, includes “sexual conduct by a child.” We must decide if the trial court erred in denying Stelmack’s motion for judgment of acquittal in which he argued that the evidence was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Thayer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Hutchinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. DALE ROBERT BACH, —Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. Capers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KenvinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. JUAN MESEN v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. Parker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API