Legal Opinion

Hugh D. MacKenzie Co. v. Lydia S. S. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 2, 1924No. Nos. 355, 356PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). [1, 2,] It must be emphasized that this appeal has vacated the decree of the District Court and that the case is hero tried de novo (the John Twohy, 255 U. S. 77-79, 41 Sup. Ct. 251, 65 L. Ed. 511), although such new trial is conducted in accordance with our own rules. We have recently considered at length the rights of stipulators for value in suits in rem (The Cartona, 297 Fed. 827; The Buckhannon, 299 Fed. 519), and the same rules apply to stipulators for costs. National Surety Company had under these decisions no right to intervene, and no such effort…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. The BeaconsfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Newell v. Norton and ShipSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Vasse v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  5. T. M. Duche & Sons, Ltd. v. American Schooner "John Twohy"Supreme Court of the United States · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The LydiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  2. Kenai Ironclad v. CP Marine ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  3. Trailer Bridge, Inc. v. Louisiana International Marine LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API