Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 15, 1988No. BP-356PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE

JOANOS, Judge.

Appellant’s motion to recall mandate, which was filed prior to issuance of the mandate, has served to stay the mandate in this case. In essence, appellant’s motion sought reconsideration of the departure sentence imposed, in light of the supreme court’s opinion in Atwaters v. State, 519 So.2d 611 (Fla.1988), released contemporaneously with this court’s denial of appellant’s motion for rehearing. We deny the motion.

A jury found appellant guilty of conspiracy to traffic in more than 10,000 pounds of cannabis. Although the recommended guideline sentencing…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Albritton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Atwaters v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Dickey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Mullen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Atwaters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Rodrique v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API