Vance v. Cummins

It is conceived that the court below erred in dismissing Vance’s bill for not having released errors before the court granted him an injunction; because, by law, his confession of judgment operated as a release of errors, and ought to have been taken as such; but even if the judgment in the case had not been obtained by confession, and the court had inadvertently granted the injunction, without a release of errors, then reasonable time ought to have been given the complainant, by a rule or order of court, personally to appear and acknowledge a release, before his bill could with propriety…