Legal Opinion

Tatano v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Madonna Tatano (Claimant) and Doyle L. Tarwater, M.D., (together, Petitioners) appeal from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) affirming the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) to dismiss Dr. Tarwater’s petition for review of a utilization review determination based on the conclusion that Dr. Tarwater’s medical treatment of Claimant was not reasonable or necessary as of August 31, 1993.

Claimant was injured on August 30, 1991 when she fell down a flight of steps during the course of her employment with Copy-world of Pittsburgh (Employer).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bloom v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Florence Mining Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Kroger Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lindemuth v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. E. Hoffman-Lorah v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. Tloczynski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API