Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Borg-Warner Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1968PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGlare J. Hoyt, J.

Defendants Borg-Warner Corp. and Norge Sales Corp. have served a third-party summons and complaint on the third-party defendants Rheem Manufacturing Co. and Robertshaw-Fulton Controls Co., alleging a right of recovery on the theory of common-law indemnity from the third-party defendants in the event plaintiffs recover in the main action from the defendants-third-party plaintiffs. Although the third-party defendants are named in the title of the main action they have never been served. An earlier third-party action between the same parties was commenced in October of 1965 after the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marrone v. John A. Johnson & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Empire Shoe Co. v. Nico Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  2. Lewis v. Borg-Warner Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. Lewis v. Borg-Warner Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API