Legal Opinion

People v. Haynes

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 17, 1966No. Gen. 10,657PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Defendant appeals from a sentence of 5-14 years on a plea of guilty to the crime of forgery. In this court, defendant asserts the following errors: (a) That the indictment is fatally defective; (b) that the trial court should not have accepted a plea of guilty without determining defendant’s mental competence, and (c) the punishment is excessive.

The indictment is said to be fatally defective because it does not comply with article VI, § 33, of the Constitution of 1870 requiring that all process shall begin “In the name and by the authority of the People of the State of Illinois,” and conclude…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. The People v. HarperIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. The PEOPLE v. ShrakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  4. The PEOPLE v. MotisIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  5. The People v. GouldIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. LillieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  2. People Ex Rel. Miller v. PateIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. MacEAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  4. People v. SamplesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  5. People v. LannersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API