Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Roudebush

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 23, 1977No. 76-1560PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

352 So.2d 908 (1977)

Joseph F. PUTNAM and Vance D. Bishop, As Trustees under Trust No. 17498, Appellants,

v.

Wilson F. ROUDEBUSH et Ux., Appellees.

No. 76-1560.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 23, 1977.

Rehearing Denied December 27, 1977.

Thomas M. Harris of Harris, Harris & Andrews, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellants.

McNULTY, JOSEPH P. (Ret.), Associate Judge.

This action is predicated upon an alleged breach of an implied warranty of fitness and merchantability.

The Roudebushes, as plaintiffs, purchased a condominium apartment from appellants, trustees and developers…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gable v. SilverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. House v. ThorntonWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. SaffoldSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. Lambert v. SistrunkSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  5. United States Steel Corp. v. BenefieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Drexel Properties, Inc. v. BAY COLONY, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Maronda Homes, Inc. v. Lakeview Reserve Homeowners Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  3. Lochrane Engineering, Inc. v. Willingham Realgrowth Inv. Fund, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Conklin v. HurleySupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  5. Greenburg v. JohnstonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API