Legal Opinion

Duke Power Co. v. Salisbury Zoning Board of Adjustment

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1974No. 7419SC91PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARSON, Judge.

At common law the right to appeal was limited to parties in the action who were aggrieved by the ruling of the court. 4 Am. Jur. 2d, Appeal and Error, § 173. This common law rule has been codified in North Carolina under G.S. 1-271 which states as follows:

Who may appeal. — Any party aggrieved may appeal in the cases prescribed in this chapter. A party who cross assigns error in the grant or denial of a motion under the Rules of Civil Procedure is a party aggrieved.

While the persons complaining of the court’s ruling may have been aggrieved by the proximity of their land to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Zoning Violation of ColemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Siler v. . BlakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re BrownleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Cook v. Union Zoning Bd. of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Boone v. BooneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Cook v. UNION ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENTCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API