Legal Opinion

Te-Mamou Water District v. Pelts & Skins Export, Ltd.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 2000No. 99-1749Published

1Opinion of the Court

JjDECUIR, Judge.

Te-Mamou Water District filed suit on open account against Pelts & Skins Export, Ltd. for money due from the sale of water. Pelts & Skins reconvened, alleging damages incurred from the use of water contaminated with sand and sold by the Water District; the reconventional demand was styled as a breach of contract action. The Water District filed an exception of prescription to the reconventional demand, arguing that the demand for damages was a tort claim subject to liberative prescription of one year and the provisions of La.Code Civ.P. art. 1067. The trial judge agreed with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J. B. Beaird Co. v. Burris Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Rapides Grocery Co. v. CloptonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  3. Dixie Building Materials Co., Inc. v. Bob L. Whittington & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  4. Dixie Building Material Co. v. Bob L. Whittington & Associates, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API