Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Hatten

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 1, 2004No. 3D03-2539PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

880 So.2d 1271 (2004)

In re ESTATE OF Louise HATTEN.

Antoinette Tartaglia, Jeanette Kidd, and Anthony Hatten, Appellants,

v.

Louis Hatten, individually, Appellee.

No. 3D03-2539.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

September 1, 2004.

Jose Saavedra, Miami,for appellants.

Walton Lantaff Schroeder & Carson, Lawrence D. Smith, Miami, and Erich B. Neumann, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before COPE, GODERICH, and GREEN, JJ.

COPE, J.

This is an appeal of a summary judgment in favor of the defendant in an action for interference with a testamentary expectancy. We conclude that disputed issues of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. DeWitt v. DuceSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. McDougald v. CoueySupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  3. Allstate Insurance Company v. DoodyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Mathews v. HinesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1978
  5. Walton v. Estate of WaltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cooper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
  2. Billue v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
  3. Brennan v. ESTATE OF BRENNANDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Smith v. DeParryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. Kenneth Pilak, Russel Pilak and Deborah Ruthenburg v. Timothy G. Reigel and the Estate of Ronald G. SasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API