Legal Opinion

Dwight & Lloyd Sintering Co. v. American Ore Reclamation Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 14, 1920No. 105PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern-District of New York. Action by the Dwight & Lloyd Sintering Company, Incorporated,, against the American Ore Reclamation Company, to recover an unpaid balance of royalties claimed to be due from defendant on a license-agreement.

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error’s assignor, Dwight & Lloyd Metallurgical Company, entered into a contract in the city and state of New York, as licensor, with the firm of Gayley & Robinson, the assignors of the defendant in error, as licensee. By the terms of' this contract, the plaintiff in error was to be paid 3 cents per ton as a. royalty. Periodical settlements were to be made on the per ton basis. It was an exclusive license to use the patents in the iron and steel industries in the United States, Canada, Mexico, and Cuba. Eor the fee of 3 cents per avoirdupois ton for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. United States v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. House v. MayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Chicago & A. Ry. Co. v. Pressed Steel Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sablowsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  2. United States ex rel. Harris v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  3. R. H. Macy & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  4. United States v. PorterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API