Hall v. Hall

This is an action to replevy an automobile. At the close of appellant’s defensive evidence, the trial court granted respondent’s motion, nonsuit-ing appellant upon her counterclaim pleaded in defense of the action, and directed the jury to return a verdict for respondent. A motion for a new trial was unsuccessfully made by appellant, and judgment was entered upon the verdict so ordered.

Appellant purchased the car sought to be replevied from the Sunset Motor Company, a corporation, at Seattle, under a written conditional sale contract which is in evidence. The contract was made June 23, 1923.…